The litigation support track kicked off following the keynote presentation on Monday morning with a session titled “A Need for Speed: Leveraging Analytics in Document Review”. Our highly experienced and skilled group of panelists teamed up with their providers to give attendees a detailed description and demonstration of how they have leveraged analytics in specific case scenarios. Use of analytics resulted in better results at a lower cost.
Continue reading for more details or Click here to download audio recording
The session started with panelists discussing how to optimize a data set prior to using analytics. Tips included how to deal with certain types of information that may skew results before beginning analytics.
Greg Chan, Bingham McCutchen LLP teamed up with Neil Etheridge of Recommind to walk us through a case where his firm had an incoming government production that spanned terabytes of productions. Greg and Neil showed how using multiple issue coding in Recommind was very effective in identifying and prioritizing key documents.
Mike Quartararo, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP teamed up with Greg Houston of kCURA to discuss and demonstrate how they managed an incoming production from opposing counsel of 47,000 documents. They leveraged a combination of email threading, near duplicate analysis, clustering and statistical sampling to efficiently and effectively identify documents that required attorney review.
Joy Holley, Bryan Cave, LLP teamed up with Ryan Nichols of Lateral Data to discuss and demonstrate how they leveraged advanced analytics in Viewpoint to analyze over 2 million documents for an internal investigation in just a few weeks. Joy and Ryan showed how using Concept Analyzer initially combined with TAR and email threading, followed by another round of TAR enabled them to quickly identify numerous critical documents that gave the client the guidance they needed.
Click here to download audio recording